Confidence Type
|
Description
|
Analysis Applicability
|
---|---|---|
Lower Confidence
|
Defines a value above which a specified percentage of the population is likely to fall. For example, for a one-sided lower confidence bound of 90 percent, 90 percent of the population falls above the stated value. In the probability plot, the lower bound appears below the best-fit line. Thus, the one-sided lower bound reports that the true parameter values are less than or equal to the reported parameter values at the specified level of confidence.
|
• All but degradation analysis
|
Double Confidence
|
Defines an interval within which some values fall above and some fall below the reported value. For example, for a double confidence bounds of 90 percent, 45 percent of the expected parameter values fall above, and 45 percent fall below, the reported parameter. Thus, the double confidence bounds report an interval for which the true parameter values are likely to fall above and below the reported value at the specified level of confidence. In the probability plot, the lower bound appears below the best-fit line, and the upper bound appears above the best-fit line.
|
• All but degradation analysis
|
Upper Confidence
|
Defines a value below which a specified percentage of the population is likely to fall. For example, for a one-sided upper confidence bound of 90 percent, 90 percent of the population falls below the stated value. In the probability plot, the upper bound appears above the best-fit line. Thus, the one-sided upper bound reports that the true parameter values are greater than or equal to the reported parameter values at the specified level of confidence.
|
• All but degradation analysis
|
Upper and Lower
|
Defines a closed interval between which a specified percentage of the population is likely to fall. For example, for a given interval of 90 percent confidence between two values X and Y, 90 percent of the population falls within the interval between X and Y, with 10% of the population falling outside the bounds (5 percent below Y and 5 percent above Y). Thus, the two-sided bounds (upper and lower), which are also known as confidence intervals, report a closed interval within which the true parameter values are likely to fall at the given interval of some specified level of confidence. In the probability plot, the lower bound appears below the best-fit line, and the upper bound appears above the best-fit line.
|
• All but reliability growth and degradation analysis
|
Confidence = Reliability
|
Indicates that the reliability value is used as the confidence value. Sometimes, choosing the best confidence level is difficult. Ideally, you want the confidence level to be high. Unfortunately, the higher the confidence level, the lower reliability value. To obtain a higher reliability value, you might use a lower confidence level. For example, at 95 percent confidence, the reliability value might be 0.90, but at 90 percent confidence, the reliability value might be 0.99. In other words, you might choose to decrease the confidence level to increase the reported reliability. In such a case, you can report the confidence level at the reliability value. For example, at 92 percent confidence, the reliability value is 0.92, thereby ensuring a reliability value that is equal to the confidence value.
|
• Only parametric LDA and warranty analysis
|
|
Confidence bounds are also applicable for additional data set calculations performed using the General Statistics and Summary Calculators. For more information, see General Statistics Calculator and Summary Calculator.
|